Unveiling the Realities of Workplace Discrimination: A Call for Equitable Change

In an era marked by diversity and inclusion initiatives, the sobering reality of workplace discrimination persists, particularly for young individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds. Recent research conducted by the Youth Futures Foundation has brought to light the pervasive nature of this issue, uncovering distressing statistics and prompting a resounding call to action for stakeholders across industries to address systemic bias.

The findings of the Youth Futures Foundation’s extensive study, derived from interviews with 3,250 young individuals, paint a stark picture of the challenges faced by ethnic minority youth as they navigate the job market. Shockingly, nearly half (48%) of respondents reported encountering discrimination or prejudice in their pursuit of employment opportunities, highlighting the prevalence of discriminatory attitudes and practices within workplaces.


Amidst the millions of parents who invest their hopes and dreams in the education of their children lies a poignant narrative of anticipation and aspiration. They envision a future where their offspring will transcend barriers, flourish in the workplace, and contribute meaningfully to society. However, the harsh reality awaiting many young individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds unveils a stark contrast to these aspirations—a reality marred by the traumatic wickedness of racism in the workplace.

One of the most concerning aspects illuminated by the research is the prevalence of racist remarks and jokes directed towards young individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds. A significant proportion (33%) of respondents revealed experiencing such offensive comments within their respective workplaces, contributing to an environment fraught with hostility and exclusion.

Furthermore, the study revealed that discriminatory behavior persists even after individuals secure employment. Two-thirds (66%) of respondents admitted to overhearing racist slurs or jokes from coworkers or supervisors, while one in five (20%) recounted instances of derogatory remarks directed towards them by colleagues, underscoring the pervasive nature of discriminatory attitudes within organizational cultures.

The detrimental impact of workplace discrimination extends beyond immediate emotional distress, profoundly affecting the long-term career trajectories and aspirations of affected individuals. Alarmingly, seven in ten (70%) of those who faced discrimination expressed considerations of changing jobs or abandoning their chosen industries altogether, highlighting the profound disillusionment and disengagement resulting from discriminatory experiences.

Compounding the issue is the reluctance of young individuals to report instances of discrimination, fueled by skepticism regarding the effectiveness of formal reporting mechanisms. A staggering 69% of respondents who experienced discrimination refrained from reporting it, citing a lack of confidence in organizational responses and fear of reprisal, further perpetuating a culture of silence and impunity.

Echoing the sentiments expressed by the study’s participants, Oscar, Chair of the Future Voices Group, emphasized the importance of addressing both overt and subtle forms of discrimination in the workplace. He stressed the need for employers to adopt a zero-tolerance approach towards non-inclusive behavior and implement robust diversity and inclusion initiatives aimed at fostering a culture of respect and belonging.

In response to these troubling findings, Youth Futures Foundation advocates for urgent action from both employers and policymakers to dismantle barriers to workplace inclusion. Lord Woolley, a Board Member at Youth Futures Foundation, underscored the imperative of addressing widespread discrimination to ensure the equitable participation of young individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds in the workforce, calling for concrete measures to promote diversity and combat bias.

Sarah Yong, Director of Policy and Communications at Youth Futures Foundation, emphasized the significance of understanding and addressing the underlying barriers faced by young minority individuals in accessing employment opportunities. She called for proactive measures to combat discriminatory practices, including mandated reporting mechanisms, robust anti-discrimination policies, and comprehensive diversity training for employees at all levels.

As we confront the uncomfortable truths revealed by this research, it is imperative for all stakeholders to prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workplace. By taking decisive action to eradicate discrimination and foster a culture of belonging, we can create a more equitable and inclusive society, where every individual has the opportunity to thrive and contribute to their fullest potential, regardless of their ethnic background or iden

london, willis building, reflection-3529954.jpg

This Article is brought to you by

Loopline Media

Catch up with the Author

Post-Brexit: data protection
Card processor sends sensitive data to wrong address
24 August 2022

Worldline SA subsidiary Payone GmbH has been accused of breaching data protection rules after it sent sensitive employee payroll information to the wrong address by accident. The Worldline Group holdS a 60% stake in the Frankfurt based company who have a small UK market presence.

In June 2021, one of Payone GmbH’s ex UK employees (the data subject) received a “potential data breach notification” from the firm advising him that his salary, National Insurance data, nationality (Special Category Data) was amongst various bits of information sent to an incorrect home address.

This included personal information such as the former employees name, age and address.  It also included details such as the date of birth and the amount of annual work bonus he received in his bank account amongst other identifiable data.

Payone GmbH confirmed that this document was sent out in error following an employee making a mistake when re-entering data processed by their third-party payroll provider.  The error arose when the employee was fulfilling an Article 15 GDPR request. The error was spotted by the data subject when he noticed in an email version of the document that the postal address was incorrect. An attempt to notify Payone GmbH of the error went in vain as the document was already irretrievably despatched.

The data subject was alarmed with the incident which exposed him to the possibility of fraudulent activity, amidst reasonable fears his data could end up on the dark web and used by criminals.  Habitually resident in the UK he complained to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) in June 2021. He similarly raised the concern in Germany via The Hessian Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (HBDI).

The ICO reprimanded Payone GmbH for the error in their final decision letter.
Similarly, the HBDI cited a violation of Article 5(f) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) relating to integrity and confidentiality.

The ICO stated in their July 2021 findings that Payone GmbH, “should take steps to ensure that all personal data records are accurate and up to date. Holding inaccurate information, such as addresses, does increase the risk of personal data breaches and poses risks to the security of information”.

The HBDI confirmed in their October 2021 findings that Payone GmbH had taken remedial action. They concluded that a monetary fine would not be imposed on Payone GmbH as they had taken technical and organisational steps in response to the data breach. Data subjects could now request their data in an autonomous portal.

The GDPR, which came into effect in 2018, gave the Information Commissioner’s Office greater powers to tackle data breaches. The new ‘UK GDPR’ charts its own course after Brexit whilst seeking to maintain EU GDPR adequacy.  In extreme scenarios, organisations face penalties of up to £20m or 4 per cent of their global worldwide turnover, whichever is more.

In the years prior to GDPR, the ICO fines were capped at £500,000.

The data subject said: “I am just glad I spotted it; they were going to resend the document again to another wrong address. Prior to Brexit the process would have been commenced via the ICO who in turn would liaise with the HBDI on the data subjects’ behalf; but I found myself communicating with both authorities separately which was an additional step but in the end was surprisingly
effective. Unfortunately, Payone GmbH again sent my incorrect address to the
Workers Pension Trust in January 2022, and documents yet again went to the wrong address. In my opinion they have not learned from the first time and my complaint is sitting with the ICO yet again”.

The former employee is pursuing a remedy under Article 82 UK GDPR via
the Court’s of England & Wales.

Extraordinary Experiences

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Our Core Values

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

We use cookies to improve user experience and analyse website traffic. By clicking ‘Accept’, you agree to our website’s cookie use as described in our Privacy Policy.