The Psychology of Payment: How Consumers Choose Between Cash and Card

In a world where digital payment methods are rapidly gaining ground, a study from the University of Notre Dame sheds light on the enduring popularity of traditional payment methods like cash and cards. This research offers a fascinating glimpse into consumer psychology and the strategic decisions behind payment choices.

Cash vs. Card: A Global Perspective Despite the rise of digital payments, cash and card transactions continue to dominate the point-of-sale landscape globally. In 2021, a significant 65 percent of all transactions were made using these methods, as reported by Fidelity National Information Services. This statistic underscores the enduring relevance of cash and card in our increasingly digital economy.

Cash v Card

New Insights from Notre Dame The University of Notre Dame’s recent study, titled “Purchase Justifiability Drives Payment Choice: Consumers Pay With Card To Remember And Cash To Forget,” delves into the reasons behind consumers’ payment method choices. Led by Christopher Bechler, assistant professor of marketing, along with colleagues Szu-chi Huang from Stanford University and Joshua Morris from Nike, the study explores the concept of purchase justifiability and its impact on payment decisions.

The Impact of Purchase Justifiability Bechler’s research reveals a unique insight: the justifiability of a purchase significantly influences whether consumers opt for cash or card. For hard-to-justify purchases — such as overpriced items or guilty pleasures like cigarettes and candy — consumers tend to use cash. This choice is driven by a desire to eliminate the paper or electronic trail, essentially allowing them to ‘forget’ these purchases. Conversely, for easily justifiable purchases, consumers are more likely to use trackable methods like credit cards.

Methodology and Findings The research team analyzed data from 118,042 real transactions and conducted six experiments involving over 5,000 individuals to understand the causal effect of purchase justifiability on payment method choice. The findings indicate that consumers who diligently track their card expenses often use cash for certain purchases to avoid the mental burden of reflecting on them later.

Implications for Merchants These insights have practical implications for businesses. For instance, a doughnut shop might benefit from accepting cash payments, as consumers may prefer to forget these indulgent purchases. In contrast, a salad shop might not see the same advantage in promoting cash transactions.

Future of Payment Methods As the financial world evolves with cryptocurrencies and innovative payment methods, understanding these behavioral patterns becomes crucial. For merchants and financial institutions, grasping the factors that influence payment choices is key to predicting the adoption and success of new payment technologies.

Conclusion This study from Notre Dame offers a compelling look at the psychological factors driving consumer payment choices. As we navigate a world of diverse payment options, such insights are invaluable for both consumers and businesses in understanding the subtleties of financial decision-making.

Source Acknowledgement: This article is based on the study “Purchase Justifiability Drives Payment Choice: Consumers Pay With Card To Remember And Cash To Forget” from the University of Notre Dame, as reported by Shannon Roddel. The study was conducted by Christopher Bechler, along with Szu-chi Huang and Joshua Morris, and is forthcoming in the Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.

london, willis building, reflection-3529954.jpg

This Article is brought to you by

Loopline Media

Catch up with the Author

Post-Brexit: data protection
Card processor sends sensitive data to wrong address
24 August 2022

Worldline SA subsidiary Payone GmbH has been accused of breaching data protection rules after it sent sensitive employee payroll information to the wrong address by accident. The Worldline Group holdS a 60% stake in the Frankfurt based company who have a small UK market presence.

In June 2021, one of Payone GmbH’s ex UK employees (the data subject) received a “potential data breach notification” from the firm advising him that his salary, National Insurance data, nationality (Special Category Data) was amongst various bits of information sent to an incorrect home address.

This included personal information such as the former employees name, age and address.  It also included details such as the date of birth and the amount of annual work bonus he received in his bank account amongst other identifiable data.

Payone GmbH confirmed that this document was sent out in error following an employee making a mistake when re-entering data processed by their third-party payroll provider.  The error arose when the employee was fulfilling an Article 15 GDPR request. The error was spotted by the data subject when he noticed in an email version of the document that the postal address was incorrect. An attempt to notify Payone GmbH of the error went in vain as the document was already irretrievably despatched.

The data subject was alarmed with the incident which exposed him to the possibility of fraudulent activity, amidst reasonable fears his data could end up on the dark web and used by criminals.  Habitually resident in the UK he complained to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) in June 2021. He similarly raised the concern in Germany via The Hessian Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (HBDI).

The ICO reprimanded Payone GmbH for the error in their final decision letter.
Similarly, the HBDI cited a violation of Article 5(f) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) relating to integrity and confidentiality.

The ICO stated in their July 2021 findings that Payone GmbH, “should take steps to ensure that all personal data records are accurate and up to date. Holding inaccurate information, such as addresses, does increase the risk of personal data breaches and poses risks to the security of information”.

The HBDI confirmed in their October 2021 findings that Payone GmbH had taken remedial action. They concluded that a monetary fine would not be imposed on Payone GmbH as they had taken technical and organisational steps in response to the data breach. Data subjects could now request their data in an autonomous portal.

The GDPR, which came into effect in 2018, gave the Information Commissioner’s Office greater powers to tackle data breaches. The new ‘UK GDPR’ charts its own course after Brexit whilst seeking to maintain EU GDPR adequacy.  In extreme scenarios, organisations face penalties of up to £20m or 4 per cent of their global worldwide turnover, whichever is more.

In the years prior to GDPR, the ICO fines were capped at £500,000.

The data subject said: “I am just glad I spotted it; they were going to resend the document again to another wrong address. Prior to Brexit the process would have been commenced via the ICO who in turn would liaise with the HBDI on the data subjects’ behalf; but I found myself communicating with both authorities separately which was an additional step but in the end was surprisingly
effective. Unfortunately, Payone GmbH again sent my incorrect address to the
Workers Pension Trust in January 2022, and documents yet again went to the wrong address. In my opinion they have not learned from the first time and my complaint is sitting with the ICO yet again”.

The former employee is pursuing a remedy under Article 82 UK GDPR via
the Court’s of England & Wales.

Extraordinary Experiences

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Our Core Values

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

We use cookies to improve user experience and analyse website traffic. By clicking ‘Accept’, you agree to our website’s cookie use as described in our Privacy Policy.