Fintech in China: Integrating Payment Apps with Blockchain Growth

Navigating the digital landscape of payments in China is an exciting journey given the plethora of options available to consumers and businesses alike. Here’s a quick rundown of the top 5 Chinese payment apps that are reshaping how transactions are conducted in the world’s most populous country:

Alipay: Alipay is the kingpin of mobile payment apps in China, boasting a user base that includes a staggering 93% of digital payment customers. Much like its Western counterparts such as Apple Pay, Alipay functions as an eWallet, storing your debit or credit card information and enabling you to breeze through checkout lines and online payments with just your smartphone. Alipay isn’t just for buying; you can also send and receive money with ease. For international visitors, the Alipay Tour Pass is an especially handy feature, making it simpler to navigate payments while traveling in China.

WeChat Pay: Running a close second in popularity, WeChat Pay captures 86% of the mobile payment market, integrating seamlessly with the ubiquitous social media platform WeChat. This app doubles as a digital wallet connected directly to your bank account, allowing you to make payments, transfer money to peers, and settle bills both online and in-store wherever WeChat Pay is accepted. Its integration into a platform already used daily by millions for messaging and social networking significantly boosts its convenience and user base.

UnionPay: Unlike the more consumer-focused apps, UnionPay is the brainchild of commercial banks, designed to link and streamline services across the UnionPay network. This app not only facilitates easy management of bank accounts but also supports mobile payment services. With UnionPay, users can add their bank card and then make payments via QR codes or NFC technology, both online and in physical stores.

JD Pay: Initially created for use on JD.com, one of China’s largest online retailers, JD Pay has expanded its services beyond the e-commerce platform to include various third-party retailers and even some brick-and-mortar stores. Users need to register with JD Pay and link their UnionPay, Visa, or Mastercard credit or debit cards to start enjoying smooth cashless transactions.

Tenpay: Developed by the tech giant Tencent, which also brought WeChat to life, Tenpay is another formidable player in the digital wallet space. It focuses on making contactless payments and sending money with ease. For online shoppers, Tenpay’s Express Checkout feature offers a quick and efficient payment solution, streamlining the buying process to just a few seconds.

Fintech in China

    In October 2019, a significant shift occurred in the perception and potential use of blockchain technology in China. The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China organized a comprehensive study session dedicated to this cutting-edge technology. This signaled a renewed enthusiasm for blockchain technology across various sectors of China’s economy. This move was particularly noteworthy given the shadow cast over the sector by the 2017 ban on initial coin offerings (ICOs), which had significantly curtailed the vibrancy of China’s burgeoning blockchain scene. President Xi’s open support was seen not just as a regulatory softening, but as a clarion call for renewed vigor in exploring blockchain’s potential applications, from enhancing data security to revolutionizing supply chain logistics and beyond.

    This renewed focus bore tangible fruits when, on February 5, 2020, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) released a new set of industry standards concerning the security of financial distributed ledger technologies, known as the Financial Distributed Ledger Technology Security Specification. These guidelines marked a pivotal step in standardizing blockchain applications within the financial sector, addressing critical areas such as operational security, risk management, and the integrity of financial services. The establishment of these standards is crucial for fostering a secure environment for the adoption of blockchain technologies, paving the way for more robust and trustworthy internet-based transactions.

    Further solidifying this trajectory, the Fintech Development Plan (2022–2025) issued by the PBOC laid out a strategic blueprint for the integration of blockchain technology within China’s financial landscape. The plan outlines ambitious goals to harness distributed ledger, smart contracts, and consensus mechanisms to tackle prevalent issues in data security and transaction integrity. Specifically, the focus on enhancing applications in supply chain finance and trade finance indicates a clear intent to leverage blockchain to streamline these complex systems, thereby boosting efficiency and reducing fraud risks. This initiative not only underscores China’s commitment to modernizing its financial services through technology but also positions the country at the forefront of global fintech innovation. With these concerted efforts, China is setting the stage for a fintech future that promises greater security, efficiency, and economic synergy, showcasing a positive outlook for blockchain technology’s role in reshaping financial services globally.

    london, willis building, reflection-3529954.jpg

    This Article is brought to you by

    Loopline Media

    Catch up with the Author

    Post-Brexit: data protection
    Card processor sends sensitive data to wrong address
    24 August 2022

    Worldline SA subsidiary Payone GmbH has been accused of breaching data protection rules after it sent sensitive employee payroll information to the wrong address by accident. The Worldline Group holdS a 60% stake in the Frankfurt based company who have a small UK market presence.

    In June 2021, one of Payone GmbH’s ex UK employees (the data subject) received a “potential data breach notification” from the firm advising him that his salary, National Insurance data, nationality (Special Category Data) was amongst various bits of information sent to an incorrect home address.

    This included personal information such as the former employees name, age and address.  It also included details such as the date of birth and the amount of annual work bonus he received in his bank account amongst other identifiable data.

    Payone GmbH confirmed that this document was sent out in error following an employee making a mistake when re-entering data processed by their third-party payroll provider.  The error arose when the employee was fulfilling an Article 15 GDPR request. The error was spotted by the data subject when he noticed in an email version of the document that the postal address was incorrect. An attempt to notify Payone GmbH of the error went in vain as the document was already irretrievably despatched.

    The data subject was alarmed with the incident which exposed him to the possibility of fraudulent activity, amidst reasonable fears his data could end up on the dark web and used by criminals.  Habitually resident in the UK he complained to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) in June 2021. He similarly raised the concern in Germany via The Hessian Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (HBDI).

    The ICO reprimanded Payone GmbH for the error in their final decision letter.
    Similarly, the HBDI cited a violation of Article 5(f) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) relating to integrity and confidentiality.

    The ICO stated in their July 2021 findings that Payone GmbH, “should take steps to ensure that all personal data records are accurate and up to date. Holding inaccurate information, such as addresses, does increase the risk of personal data breaches and poses risks to the security of information”.

    The HBDI confirmed in their October 2021 findings that Payone GmbH had taken remedial action. They concluded that a monetary fine would not be imposed on Payone GmbH as they had taken technical and organisational steps in response to the data breach. Data subjects could now request their data in an autonomous portal.

    The GDPR, which came into effect in 2018, gave the Information Commissioner’s Office greater powers to tackle data breaches. The new ‘UK GDPR’ charts its own course after Brexit whilst seeking to maintain EU GDPR adequacy.  In extreme scenarios, organisations face penalties of up to £20m or 4 per cent of their global worldwide turnover, whichever is more.

    In the years prior to GDPR, the ICO fines were capped at £500,000.

    The data subject said: “I am just glad I spotted it; they were going to resend the document again to another wrong address. Prior to Brexit the process would have been commenced via the ICO who in turn would liaise with the HBDI on the data subjects’ behalf; but I found myself communicating with both authorities separately which was an additional step but in the end was surprisingly
    effective. Unfortunately, Payone GmbH again sent my incorrect address to the
    Workers Pension Trust in January 2022, and documents yet again went to the wrong address. In my opinion they have not learned from the first time and my complaint is sitting with the ICO yet again”.

    The former employee is pursuing a remedy under Article 82 UK GDPR via
    the Court’s of England & Wales.

    Extraordinary Experiences

    Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

    Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

    Our Core Values

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

    We use cookies to improve user experience and analyse website traffic. By clicking ‘Accept’, you agree to our website’s cookie use as described in our Privacy Policy.